Turn Long Post Into Audio.



Turn World Peace's Long Post Into Audio
Text-To-Speech free basic download: Natural Reader

http://www.facebook.com/DailyWorldPeace?ref=tn_tnmn
www.facebook.com/iWantGodBackInAmerica
Showing posts with label moral. Show all posts
Showing posts with label moral. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Why Moral Sexuality is Golden

Sexuality of course is more than just the act of sex.

Sex includes everything that a person possess in mind and body that is male or female.

It is the “aspect of our being that lies behind, produces and is given expression by our physical sexual characteristics and reproductive capacity,” in the words of Christian ethicist Stephen J. Grenz.

He describes that masculinity or femininity is “not operative in one restricted area of life but is rather at the core and center of our total life response,” as the Catholic Church has put it.  In other words, sex is not just a simple act of a few moments of enjoyment.

Because sexuality encompasses a person’s whole being, then any sexual relation with another will include all the dimensions of a whole person, good or bad.

Each of us has a material body, thoughts, feelings, a conscience, connection to higher meaning, family, community and so forth.

This is the same with sexuality.

Sex involves the physical and psychological aspects, social, cultural, interpersonal factors, too and moral dimension and spiritual implications as well.

Sexual union is a person-to-person encounter and the dimension of morals deals with the whole-person realities.  This explains why it is much more than just a private matter between partners.

This traditional view of sex is why, “a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh,” Genesis declares 2.24

The term ‘cleaves’ represents the bonding process of two people in a marriage.  This word determines that there is more than just a oneness of flesh as a result of a sexual union, but a better translation is closer to ‘one person’.



Sexuality Reflects the Dimensions of the Whole Person

Sexuality reflects the heart’s impulses.






Because male has no meaning apart from female, and vice versa, sexuality also means incompleteness.







In a sense, sexual instinct is a counterpart to the spiritual heart impulse.

Ethicist Lewis B. Smedes describes sexuality as the “human impulse towards intimate communion.”

Even though contemporary beliefs lend toward the individual being self sufficient and our defensive reaction isolate themselves from painful encounters, sex impels us towards a close connection with another person.

Not only the sexual urge and act, but even our organs give testimony to the principle of living for another.






In this sense, our genital organs symbolizes the desire of the heart for oneness with the spouse.
 






This is at the core of what Pope John Paul II called the “nuptial meaning of the body,” that is, its capacity for union and communion through selfless giving.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach observes that sex is “simply the only human activity that physically necessitates another human being.”

The sexual organs are the only body part that cannot fulfill its fullest function without their counterpart in a member of the opposite sex.  Otherwise they are almost useless.

This is true also for the spiritual heart.  It cannot find fulfillment without the beloved either.  Indeed, the heart and the sexual parts are connected.  One moves the other.






There is a mysterious link of reinforcement between the communion of lovers’ hearts and union of their genitals.







A man must yield his body to the woman in order for her to experience the true meaning of her physical sexuality and vice versa.

This primal, inescapable need draws the two sexes to bridge the divide between the two and strengthens and concedes their weakness for one another.

Therefore, the sexual urge gives an innate push of both masculinity and feminity to become one towards a greater love and completeness.


Three Responsibilities of Sexual Love

These inherent responsibilities translate into the most basic and universal of sexual codes: An individual’s sexual expression is reserved solely for his or her spouse.

The first responsibility of those who want to delve into sexual love is to be true to one’s conscience.

The good mind which directs our heart’s desire to find joy through love.  When you are responsible toward your good conscience this represents living by morals, honoring the sacredness of one’s heart and body and the power of sexuality to merge all of these aspects with another‘s.

To be responsible is to respect the gifts of love, life and lineage.

Also, sexuality has the potential to enhance or through its misuse compromise these gifts.

In addition, when you respect the guidance of your conscience, the responsibility to your parents, grandparents, tribe and past ancestors are included.





One aspect is upholding the family honor.






“I’ve gone a little farther than I intended to sometimes,” Cal, 21, admits. “But my fiancĂ©e and I have basically held the line at just holding hands. Partly it would be against what I believe in that lovemaking is for marriage.

"But partly I’d be ashamed in front of my parents. My father’s first and only woman was my mother and he was pure and inexperienced when he married my Mom. It was the same with my grandparents. Dad once told me he had been really tempted one time during his marriage, but one reason he didn’t give in was because he did not want to set that kind of example for me. Times are a lot different than they were for my father, but I still feel I want to uphold my family’s principles.”


Conscience Child Sexual Love Spouse

Another aspect is to make sure that one’s sexuality is a force of blessing for the community and nation and not become an opposite force.






Clearly there is a public dimension to the private sexual act. 








Even though we have become a society of people that believe that whatever someone does in their spare time is their own business, private matters can become public problems.

When you think of cases of couples who conceive children who partly become the responsibility of community.

This includes the legal devastation to the families who are torn apart through one of the parents, or spouse having sex outside the marriage.

Raymond J. Lawrence, an ethicist, stated, “what happens in any bedroom is always potentially the business of the whole human family.”

Furthermore, to be responsible to live up to one’s own conscience involves one to achieve full maturity of their heart and character.

This also means for a person of sufficient mind and body unity to be worthy to partake in the privilege of sexual love and to fulfill the other two responsibilities.

If we compromise our chastity in any way, then we must heed the guidance of our conscience, make amends and rededicate our live to God’s original standard.



Responsibility to the Present or Future Spouse


This second responsibility of sexual love recognizes the obligations that come with a lasting marriage.







The potential for conjugal love is destroyed if shared with anyone besides the spouse. 






For a couple to have a lasting marriage, this means they must have a commitment to cherish and care for the other and dedicate their heart and sexual expression only to their partner alone.

Through this commitment, this preserves trust, which is the bedrock of love, by allowing the couple to be faithful to each other.

Single people are not excluded from this responsibility.  They must be mindful of their future husband or wife and practice fidelity before they meet them.

In today’s society of free sex, this does not come naturally and sometimes have to be fought for against the worldly view of sex for recreation.

“I imagine it’s my future wife,” explains a high school student about an empty picture frame near his bed. “I’ve had it there since I was 13, and I sometimes write letters to her when I get lonely. When my friends tell stories of fooling around with their girlfriends and I start to feel left out, I think about my future wife and how I want to save the excitement for her.”


Responsibility to Existing or Potential Children



When a couple enters into a sexual union, the commitment to any fruits this love may bare implies the third responsibility.

The parents have the responsibility to lovingly nurture this new being’s material and spiritual needs whom they chosen to create.

When parents are neglectful or abusive to their children, they do them and society a grave disservice.






A loving marriage is the most secure foundation for the nurturing of a child. 








Children need the attention of both their parents.

All children naturally long for their parents to love each other and be together.  This is not only for their physical or emotional needs, but to affirm their identity and value as an individual.

Marriage is an anchor for their lineage as children want to know that they are born of enduring love.

Such parents pass on a sound legacy and a healthy tradition for their descendants to inherit, imitate and build upon.

“As a father of four,” says author Daniel Gray, “I am reaping the dividends [of
investments made] years earlier when I heard and put into practice the message of abstinence before marriage,” a key dividend being his
moral authority in guiding his children.




All children deserve to be proud of the quality of love that conceived and raised them.








These three responsibilities of sexual love encompass the deep dimensions of sexuality: The first to conscience, the second to love and the third to life and lineage.

To fulfill these three responsibilities, one must practice commitment and lifelong monogamy and purity before marriage.

This is reflected in the words of one young adult, a male virgin, who gave these common sense conditions for beginning a sexual relationship: “a willingness to spend a lifetime with my partner and/or the children we create.”

This standard allows the power of love to bind individuals, families and ultimately a society together in strength and safeguard their futures.


Return for Tomorrow’s Post: The Five Myths About Sex


This post was rewritten and derived from the religious textbook, “Educating for True Love” written by a team of writers explaining the philosophy of Reverend Sun Myung Moon on Love and Marriage.






Wednesday, April 3, 2013

7 days of Holy Sex`Day 3 - Original Moral Code


“The owner of a husband’s sexual organ is his wife, and the owner of a wife’s sexual organ is her husband,” teaches Reverend Moon. "Marriage is finding the rightful master of one’s most holy place of love.”

In the previous post, we spoke about 8 points of the benefits of sex in a marriage.  These are the basics of sexual codes: An individual's sexual expression was meant to be reserved for only his or her spouse.

The only priest or priestess allowed to enter the Holy of Holies in the temple of the body is the married partner.

 The Qur’an concurs: “The believers are . . . those who guard their private parts except with their spouses”

When it comes to conjugal love, partners already have this sense of belonging to their beloved. "You own my heart,” they profess to each other.

In the Song of Solomon, the young woman says, “My beloved is mine and I am his”.

Couples promise their undying commitment, share their fortunes and futures and give all they have and what they will acquire to one another.  The greatest gift of this love is the exclusive affection and trust in an exclusive sexual relationship.  This is why it is natural for a husband and wife to claim their spouse on their beloved's love and his or her sexual expression.

Legal codes have historically recognized this expectation as “conjugal rights.

St. Paul, for example, speaks of this standard when he states, “The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does.”

1 Corinthians 7:4


This means that each of us is a caretaker of our reproductive organs, attending them as a treasure for the sake of the true owner our spouse and the Creator.  This sense of entitlement or proprietorship, of course, is necessarily in the spirit of respect and care.

Again, the Bible goes on to say that, “Even so, husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.”

Spouses are to love one another even as god loves and sacrifices for each of them.  Each denying themselves  for the other and the duty to satisfy each other sexually is part of the larger promise within a marriage.  The world's major religious traditions for thousands of years have been consistent and of one accord in affirming commitment in a sexual union as the norm.


Religion Teaches Sexual Sacredness

Rev. Sun Myung Moon has used his 93 years of knowledge of the spirit world and different religions to bring about the truth of absolute, pure sex in the following speech:

All religions share the strict prohibition against sex outside of marriage, especially against infidelity within marriage. “You shall not commit adultery,” is among the Ten Commandments recognized recognized by Christians and Jews Exodus 20:14 and affirmed by Muslims Qur’an 6.151-53.

Among the ten precepts recognized by Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism is the charge of chastity.

This uncompromising norm will never change or become outdated. It is everlasting, having originated in the Creator and conforming to the very design and purpose of human creation.

Reverend Moon calls it the absolute sex standard. This is the standard “in the beginning” to which

Jesus was referring when he commented about matters of marriage Matthew 19:8.

The gold standard of sexual morality This norm is indeed latent within people’s consciences and “written on their hearts” Romans 2:15.

Common sense tells us abiding by this simple standard establishes the safety and security necessary for the greatest sexual satisfaction for both partners, and only these conditions will contain all the potential consequences of sexual union for the partners, their families and society.

Those involved with public health policy call it the “gold standard” of sexual morality, because it averts all the myriad negative health, social and other consequences of sexual behavior.



Confronting the Permissive Standard

However self-evident this original standard that links sexuality to marriage might be, reaffirming and reinvigorating this is sorely needed in contemporary times.

The developed nations remain in— and developing countries continue to fall under the thrall of—the sexual revolution that broke down traditional taboos in the 1960s.  Men and women relate in a 'low-commitment culture of ‘sex without strings, relationship without rings'.

Popular sexual morality has evolved since the blatant hedonism and promiscuity of the early days of the sexual revolution, but the basic “free sex” ideology still persists among many people of influence.

This is an outlook that sees sex apart from marriage as an act of liberation against unfair restrictions and that physical involvement is no one’s business except the partners.

Fun is considered justification enough for sexual relations; lovers should expect to be discarded when someone new comes along, and marriage and parenthood are unnecessary constraints on personal freedom.

In the aftermath of rampant unwed pregnancies, divorce, disease and heartbreak, this “free sex” philosophy of sex for pleasure has progressed to what is called the “ethic of intimacy", the belief in sex for love.

Warm feelings are now the acceptable reason for men and women to enter into a physical relationship. “Loveless” or “meaningless” sex is the only kind that might be condemned. Sexual activity itself is still regarded as morally neutral; it is its motivation that determines whether it is good or not.

Such an ethic of intimacy represents a moral advance in the many cases where sexual relations are brutally selfish and exploitative.

Yet it is a far cry from the authentic standard and remains just a variation of the older idea. Mutual consent, tolerance and a loose definition of love and intimacy easily legitimate temporary liaisons based on fickle feelings.

“We were crazy about each other,” recalls one young man. “I thought, ‘This is the one.’ We even discussed marriage. I gave my virginity to her. Well, so much for ‘undying love'. Now I don’t even know where she lives.”

Such an ethic does not protect partners from agreeing to use each other and inflict harm on one another and innocent parties beyond themselves, however this might go undetected at the time.

Whether the old free sex perspective or the newer ethic of intimacy, sexuality is regarded as a domain with its own rules, a unique impulse that cannot and must not be overly controlled. Sex is seen as a need to be addressed like that of food and sleep, and thus vital to mental and physical health. More than this, it is an entitlement, a right that cannot be denied.

In popular culture, sex is the universal gateway to joy, love, wisdom, transcendent experience, personal growth and discovery, worthy of endless participation, depiction and discussion. It has taken on mythic dimensions, like the Holy Grail or fountain of youth, and is almost an object of worship, as mentioned above.

This is a well-worn detour from the truth.

History abounds with examples of societies exalting sex out of all proportion and outside its rightful boundaries. Fertility worship in ancient Israel is a Biblical illustration.

History also testifies to the fact that whenever a society allows this to happen, destruction follows. Anthropologist Carl Zimmerman and others have discovered that the acceptance and practice of adultery and other aspects of sexual license are reliable predictors of the disintegration of a civilization.


Addressing Flawed Premises

The original sexual norm represents the enlightened and responsible standard, because it respects the realities of the heart and conscience as well as the body and harmonizes unselfish love and passion according to the human nature endowed by the Creator. The absolute sex standard confronts the flawed premises of the old “free sex” ethic: Absolute Sex Morality

The primary human motive and need is to give and receive love.



Sexual love is one dimension of this need and, while conjugal companionship and sexual intimacy are both good and healthy conditions, neither is a necessity, especially genital sexual relations. Sexual restraint is expected of any mature person.  Sexuality has intrinsic moral, spiritual, psychological and social dimensions.  Sexual love is a feature solely of the marital relationship.

It is responsible only in the context of this commitment and it is enriching only when accompanied by both love and commitment. Sexual expression is a responsibility and both a personal and public
matter.


“Free Sex” Morality

Sex is the primary human motive and need. As such, regular sexual outlets are a necessity. Too much sexual restraint is unhealthy and destructive.

Sexuality can be simply physical pleasure; it has no necessary moral, spiritual, psychological and social dimensions.  Sexual love can be a feature of any relationship; all sexual behavior is either normal or a variation.

Sex can be enriching free of love and commitment, while mutual consent and the use of birth- and disease control make it responsible. Sexual expression is an entitlement and a wholly personal matter."SMM



Return for Tomorrow's Post: 7 Days of Holy Sex Day 4: Benefits of Waiting for Marriage

This text was rewritten and derived from the Textbook: True Love, Chapter "The Meaning of Sexuality".